Straightforward exits for healthy, stable companies.
If you’ve built a steady, profitable business and want out without chaos, we’ll meet you there. We focus on fair valuation, clean structures, and people-first integration — and we buy to hold for 10+ years, not flip you in 3–5 — so you can step into your next chapter with confidence.
No success fees. No auction circus, no pressure — just a confidential way to see
if a direct sale on fair terms makes sense for you and your team.
Hold periodLong-term stewards
Typical size$1M–$20M EBITDA
BuyerDirect buyer
Owner roleImmediate exit or phased handoff
Before we move to LOI
Three things we align on before anyone signs anything.
We don’t rush to paperwork. First we make sure we’re a fit, then we align on fair value, and only
then do we show you how the deal is actually financed.
Step 1 — Fit check
Are we the right kind of buyer for you?
We start with a simple fit check: what you want from an exit, how you think about your team,
and what a “bad buyer” looks like in your mind. If our approach doesn’t match, we stop early.
Outcome: we both know whether it’s worth investing more time together.
Step 2 — FMV & expectations
Fair market value, anchored in your actual numbers.
Using your trailing results, quality of earnings, and risk profile, we share a clear
fair-market value range — with the drivers behind it, not just a headline multiple.
We also surface the number you’ve had in your head and show how any upside you’re hoping
to capture can be structured — for example via rollover, earn-out, or an advisory role
— rather than pretending it doesn’t exist or pricing it in twice.
Outcome: you see what the business supports today, what might justify the top end of the range,
and how you can still participate in future upside.
Step 3 — Proof of funds
Proof we can actually close on your deal.
Once we’re aligned on fit and value, we show you how a deal of your size and structure would
be funded, so you’re not guessing whether we’re real buyers.
What we share as proof
Depending on the situation, that can include:
Bank or lender indications for a deal in your size range.
Evidence of committed equity or co-investment capital.
Our target leverage and coverage ratios for comfort in a downturn.
Outcome: you know we have a credible path to funding before you invest months in diligence.
GH Seller journey
A clearer way to think through a sale
Most owners spend months in calls and email threads before they feel grounded
on a few basic questions. This sequence is designed to answer those questions
clearly, in order, without pressure to move forward.
Step 1
Understand the buyer landscape
See which types of buyers typically acquire companies like yours and where
your business most naturally fits — without assuming a transaction.
Step 2
See how exits are actually structured
Explore how value is paid out in real deals — cash, notes, earn-outs, and
rollovers — and which structures align with your priorities.
Step 3
Get a fair market value range
View a directional valuation range grounded in current buyer and lender
realities, informed by the structure and risk profile you just explored.
Step 4
Check alignment
Discover alignment — based on goals,
timing, expectations, and mutual fit — without obligation.
You can stop at any point. Many people do. Even partial clarity is often more
useful than another round of calls, decks, or opinions.
What this will — and won’t — do
Most owners spend a long time talking to brokers, buyers, and advisors before
they feel grounded on a few basic questions: who typically buys businesses like
theirs, how deals actually get paid out, and what numbers are realistically
supportable.
These tools won’t replace real diligence — but in a few minutes,
they can help you get oriented on the fundamentals that usually take much longer
to piece together.
Nothing here obligates you. The goal is clarity first, so you can decide what — if anything — makes sense to do next.
Technology helps us move faster; people make the decisions—nothing is automatically approved or rejected.
Who typically buys companies like yours?
This visual tool shows which buyer types are most realistic for your business
based on common acquisition requirements — not seller hopes or outlier outcomes.
Your company (estimates)
Est. EBITDA (TTM)
$2.0M
EBITDA Margin
20%
Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
8%
Customer Churn (TTM)
8%
Owner Dependence (hrs / week)
26–40
Buyer fit (directional)
Individual Buyer—%
Independent Sponsor—%
Lower Middle Market PE—%
Strategic Buyer—%
Where your company sits
IndividualSponsorPEStrategic
What this means
Based on the estimates you’ve entered, your company is currently closest to
Independent Sponsors. That’s the buyer type most
likely to lean in without needing heroic growth assumptions. Higher-bar buyers like
larger PE funds or strategics typically expect stronger scale, growth, or lower owner
dependence than what’s shown here.
Sources & assumptions:
Industry transaction data (Axial, Pepperdine Capital Markets Report),
sponsor underwriting norms, private-market EBITDA multiples, and
observed buyer requirements across SMB and lower middle market deals.
Outputs are directional only — not offers.
Knowing the buyer is only part of the picture
Different buyer types value companies differently — and more importantly,
they pay in different ways. Cash at close, seller notes, earn-outs,
and rollovers can dramatically change your real outcome.
Next, you’ll see which deal structures actually match how you want to exit.
Which deal structure actually matches how you want to exit?
Adjust the sliders to reflect how much cash you want at closing, how comfortable you are with notes,
earn-outs, and rollovers, and how long you’re willing to stay involved. We’ll show which structure
is likely the best directional fit.
Your preferences
Cash needed at close70%
Comfort with seller note / deferred payments30%
Comfort with performance-based earn-out20%
Comfort rolling equity into the new entity10%
How long are you willing to stay involved?Advisory (6–24 months)
This is illustrative, not a quote. In practice we’d work from your financials and specific goals to
design the actual term sheet.
Deal structure match (directional)
We compare your preferences against four common SMB deal patterns and highlight which one is
likely the most natural fit for you.
1. Mostly cash at close
–%
Cleanest structure: high cash at closing, minimal seller note, little to no earn-out or rollover.
Best if you want to de-risk and move on quickly.
2. Cash + seller note
–%
Meaningful cash at close plus a fixed payment schedule over time. Often improves valuation
and terms in exchange for some deferred risk.
3. Cash + rollover equity
–%
Take chips off the table now and keep a minority stake in the new entity. You benefit if the
next chapter compounds value over time.
4. Cash + earn-out
–%
Portion of the price is tied to hitting agreed-upon performance targets. Strong fit if you
believe in near-term upside and are willing to stay engaged.
Adjust the sliders to see which deal pattern your preferences lean toward. We’ll interpret the
match here in plain language so you can sense whether the structure lines up with how you actually
want to exit.
Sources & assumptions:
This reflects common patterns in lower-middle-market and SMB transactions (SBA-backed deals,
independent sponsors, and buy-and-hold buyers). It’s meant to help you understand trade-offs between
cash at close vs. notes, rollovers, and earn-outs — not to provide legal, tax, or investment advice.
Structure determines what value is actually supportable
Deal structure isn’t just about preference — it sets the boundaries for
what buyers and lenders can realistically support. The more certainty
and simplicity you want, the tighter those boundaries tend to be.
Next, you’ll see a fair market value range that reflects today’s buyer,
lender, and risk realities — not just a headline number.
What’s your fair market value (FMV)?
This estimate reflects how institutional buyers and lenders typically underwrite value.
It’s directional, not a quote, and helps frame realistic expectations before discussing structure.
Your business profile
Refine assumptions (optional)
Estimated FMV range (directional)
–
Awaiting inputs
This range reflects common SMB transaction multiples adjusted for margin quality,
growth durability, and risk profile. Actual terms depend on diligence, structure,
and buyer fit.
Illustrative only. Not legal, tax, or investment advice.
How we protect sellers
Selling a business is disruptive by default.
We design our process to reduce uncertainty, protect what you’ve built,
and keep you firmly in control—from alignment through close.
Process
Predictable, not performative
A clearly mapped path to close with limited diligence scope, defined timelines,
and steady updates—so your business doesn’t grind to a halt.
Your team
Stability over shock
We plan around your people early, preserving leadership continuity
and minimizing unnecessary disruption to culture and roles.
Incentives
Aligned from day one
No broker fees, no commissions, no pressure to “get a deal done.”
Our upside comes from owning and operating well—not from closing fast.
Confidentiality
Quiet by default
Tight information control, signed NDAs, and intentional access—
nothing circulates unless there’s a clear reason and your consent.
These principles aren’t aspirational—they’re formalized.
Each one is backed by a specific Seller Pledge you can review in detail below.
Select any pledge to see the exact commitments behind it.
Knowing your likely value and how deals are structured is useful on its own.
The last step isn’t about selling — it’s about alignment.
Timing, goals, risk tolerance, and expectations all matter on both sides.
Next, you’ll check whether interaction with Goldmont Holdings makes sense right now —
or whether it’s better to wait, adjust, or pursue a different path.
Is your business likely a fit for Goldmont?
Most owners want to know if it’s even worth a conversation.
This 60-second check gives you a directional answer—no data entry, no commitment.
Is your business profitable and operating steadily today?
Are you looking for a thoughtful exit rather than an auction?
Does protecting your team and culture matter to you?
Due diligence is used to validate what is already understood — not to revisit
agreed economics or introduce unnecessary friction. The goal is clarity,
confidence, and decision readiness for both sides.
Information requests are prioritized to minimize disruption to the business
Financial, operational, and commercial reviews run in parallel where possible
Questions are focused on confirming risk, not searching for leverage
Terms are not re-traded absent new information that materially changes risk
Sellers and their advisors retain visibility throughout the process. Transparency
and respect for your time are core expectations.
Closing the Transaction
Closing is treated as a coordinated process, not a last-minute event. The objective
is a clean, predictable close that reflects what was agreed — without unnecessary
surprises or disruption.
Documentation and approvals are prepared in parallel with final diligence
Capital and decision authority are confirmed prior to final signing
A clear closing checklist is shared so expectations are aligned in advance
Terms are not re-traded absent new information that materially changes risk
Transition & Continuity
Every business — and every seller — is different. Transition plans are designed
to preserve continuity for employees and customers while respecting the seller’s
goals for involvement after closing.
Transition scope and timing are discussed and agreed before closing
Seller involvement, if any, is defined upfront and documented clearly
Employees and customers are prioritized to minimize disruption
Knowledge transfer and handoffs are planned, not rushed
Where Deals Commonly Break — and What We Do Instead
Most transactions don’t fail because of price.
They stall when uncertainty appears late
and expectations shift.
We design our process around the moments
where deals most often break —
so outcomes remain predictable,
even when conditions change.
Six Moments Where Transaction Risk Typically Emerges
Momentum builds, diligence begins, and uncertainty surfaces late.
We define pause and stop points early, so uncertainty is addressed upfront.
Terms shift as diligence progresses, creating mistrust.
Changes occur only when diligence materially alters initial assumptions.
Capital approvals remain unresolved until late.
Capital and governance expectations are aligned before formal offers.
Post-close control and decision rights are unclear.
Roles and decision authority are defined early to ensure stability.
Sellers remain in limbo while momentum continues.
We are explicit about when we proceed, pause, or step away.
Speed is prioritized over clarity.
We prioritize alignment and predictability over pace.
What Happens Next
Moving forward is optional and always seller-led. Early interactions are digital and asynchronous (fitting every schedule) and focused on understanding fit and expectations — not forcing outcomes.
An initial high level form submission to confirm alignment and answer questions
A high-level review to determine whether it makes sense to proceed
Clear next steps shared before any time or information commitment
No obligation to move forward unless alignment is mutual
Sellers are encouraged to involve advisors at any stage. Transparency and respect
for your process come first.
You now have enough signal to decide
This process is designed to give you clarity — not to push you toward a
transaction. At this point, moving forward, waiting, or walking away are
all rational outcomes depending on your priorities.
If a alignment review would be useful, feel free to submit your basic info. If not, no follow-up
is expected.